← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15653/2022dismissed

Periyasamy v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-09-08Honourable Mrs Justice R. Tharani2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.15653 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08/09/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CRL OP(MD). No.15653 of 2022 Periyasamy ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Iurkkankudi Police Station, Virudhuangar District (Crime No. 80 of 2022).

... Respondent/Complainant Velammal ... Petitioner/Defacto Complainant in CRL MP(MD)No.10563 of 2022 For Petitioner : M/s. Banuprasath.P, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervener : M/S.PRABHA.S, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 80 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b),323,324,427,506(ii) of IPC and Section 3(1)(a) of TNPPDL Act in Cr.No.80 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 19.08.2022 the Hon'ble Minister visited the village for attending a function. The petitioner arranged all the programs, but the defacto complainant https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.15653 of 2022 who is the village Panchayat President refused to come, hence on 22.08.2022 the petitioner went to the house of the defacto complainant, abused her in filthy language, harassed her and also caused damage to the entrance gate of the defacto complainant and also caused damage to the street drinking water pipeline. Hence, the complaint.

3.On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that due to previous enmity a false case has been foisted against the petitioner and he is no way connected with the said occurrence. 4.On the side of the prosecution, it is stated that the petitioner herein went to the house of the defacto complainant, abused her in filthy language, harassed her and also caused damage to the entrance gate of the defacto complainant and also caused damage to the street drinking water pipeline. It is further stated that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. Further the petitioner was convicted in two previous cases and he has paid a sum of Rs.2000/- in both cases (STC No.288 of 2020 and 289 of 2020). It is a case and case in counter.

5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into consideration the previous bad antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Hence the petition stands dismissed.

sd/- 08/09/2022 / TRUE COPY / /09/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. The Inspector of Police, Iurkkankudi Police Station, Virudhuangar District

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1. CC to M/S. BANU PRASATH P Advocate SR.No.9816

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15653 of 2022 Date :08/09/2022 RK/SBN/SAR-II (13/09/2022) 2P/4C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2