← Library
Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/2242/2014dismissed as infructuous

Vasanthi, v. Chandrasekaran,

2020-12-07Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.12.2020 Coram:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 Smt.Vasanthi ... Petitioner in both C.R.Ps/3rd Defendant .vs.

1.Thiru Chandrasekaran 2.Smt.Selvarani 3.Thiru D.Devadass 4.Thiru Sornakumar 5.Thiru Ashok Kumar ... Respondents in C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2242/2014/Plaintiffs 1.M/s.Sterling Holiday Resorts (India) Ltd 154, Eldams Road, Teynampet, Madras - 18.

Rep. By its Dy. Manager (Legal) 2.Mrs.Ramani alias Ramanikanthammal 3.Mrs.Jyothi alias Jyothi Nageswaran 4.M.Chandrasekaran 5.N.Selvarani 6.D.Devadoss 7.D.Swarnakumar 8.Ashok Kumar

...Respondents in C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2246/2014/

Plaintiffs & Defendants 2 to 8 Prayer in C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2242/2014:-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 04.04.2014 made in I.A.No.308 of 2012 in O.S.No.182 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kodaikanal.

Prayer in C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2246/2014:-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 20.08.2014 made in I.A.No.309 of 2012 in O.S.No.155 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kodaikanal.

1/3

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2242/2014 For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.A.Srinivasan for R1 to R3 Mr.S.Vinayak for R4 & R5 C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2246/2014 For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.I.Sam Jegan for R1 Mr.K.Sandhanam for R3 Mr.A.Srinivasan for R4 to R6 Mr.S.Vinayak for R7 & R8 (R2 died vide Court order dated 24.04.2018) COMMON ORDER These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed by the petitioner against the fair and decreetal order dated 04.04.2014 made in I.A.No.308 of 2012 in O.S.No.182 of 2005 and the order dated 20.08.2014 made in I.A.No.309 of 2012 in O.S.No.155 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kodaikanal respectively.

2. When the matter came up for hearing on 23.11.2020, it was represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he had handed over the bundle to the petitioner. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list and post the matter on 07.12.2020 i.e., today.

3. Today, the name of the petitioner is printed in the cause list. However, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the respondents are present and submitted that these Civil Revision Petitions have become infructuous.

5. Recording the said submission, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) 2/3

Vsm Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1.The District Munsif District Munsif Court, Kodaikanal.

2.The Record Keeper,(2 COPIES) Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 07.12.2020 VB (16.12.2020) 3P 4C 3/3