Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/2504/2014dismissed as infructuous

S.Ramalingam, v. R.P.Pillai,

2022-01-12Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha2 pages

C.R.P(MD)No.2504 of 2014 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.01.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA C.R.P(MD)No.2504 of 2014 and M.P(MD) No.1 of 2014 S.Ramalingam ... Petitioner Vs.

1.R.P.Pillai 2.Velu 3.Sivathanu Ramasamy (Died) 4.Palani 5.Esakkiammal 6.Umaiammal 7.Ramalakshmi ... Respondents PRAYER:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the decreetal order passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District, dated 15.04.2014 made in unnumbered I.A.No. of 2014 in I.A.No.927 of 2011 in O.S.No.14 of 2000 and consequently permit the petitioner to be impleaded in the I.A.No.927 of 2011 as necessary party to the proceeding.

For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 and R2 : Mr.D.Nallathambi For R3, R4 and R5 : No appearance

ORDER

Once again there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is dismissing the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous, taking into account the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 on 05.01.2022. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cp https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.R.P(MD)No.2504 of 2014 Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To:- The Principal District Munsif, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District.

+1 CC to M/s.D.NALLATHAMBI, Advocate ( SR-1651[F] dated 19/01/2022 ) C.R.P(MD)No.2504 of 2014 and M.P(MD) No.1 of 2014 12.01.2022 RD(02/02/2022) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2