Muthukalai v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30/12/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN
1. Muthukalai
2. Muthupandi ... Petitioners/Accused Rank Not Known Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Theppakulam Police Station, Madurai City.
Crime No.1323/2020.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners: M/s.R.Ranjitha, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.M.V.Chandrasekaran, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.1323 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.
2. The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crime No.1323 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 3.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, the petitioners said to have abused the defacto complainant by using filthy language and also assaulted him with deadly weapons. Hence, the complaint. 1/3
4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, submitted that the Defacto Complainant has sustained simply injury and he has already been discharged from the hospital. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured person has already been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judge, Additional Mahalir Court, Madurai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.
(b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.
(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
2/3
(f)if the accused/petitioners thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 30/12/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO
1. THE JUDGE, ADDITIONAL MAHALIR COURT, MADURAI.
2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THEPPAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.
3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.16062 of 2020 Date :30/12/2020 MS/VR/SAR-3/04.01.2021/3P.4C 3/3