Ayyar @ Ramakrishnan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of August Two Thousand and Twenty Four PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR in CRL OP(MD) No.13276 of 2024 AYYAR @ RAMAKRISHNAN ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PAPPANADU POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT 2 S.PANDIYA RAJAN ... Respondents / Respondents Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners herein before learned Sub Court, Pattukottai, Thanjavur Ditrict, in SC.No.332/2022 pending disposal of the above Crl.OP.

Prayer in CRL OP(MD) No.13276 of 2024:

To call for the records relating to the charge sheet in SC.No.332/2022 on the file of the learned Sub Court, Pattukottai,Thanjavur District and quash the same against this petitioner alone.

Order : This criminal miscellaneous petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.ANANDAN.B, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.SANJAI GANDHI, Government Advocate (Crl. side) on behalf of the Respondent No.1, the Court made the following order:- Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the personal appearance 1/3

of the petitioner before the trial Court is ordered to be dispensed with, on conditions that he shall appear at the time of initial questioning, proceedings under Section 313 of Cr.P.C., and at the time of passing judgment and on the hearings, specifically directed by the trial court. The petitioner is further directed to give an undertaking in the form of affidavit that he will be duly represented by a counsel on all hearing dates and that the Counsel representing her will cross examine the prosecution witnesses on the same day they are examined in chief. The petitioner shall not dispute the identity of the witnesses. The petitioner shall appear before the Court in the event his presence is insisted by the trial judge for the purpose of identification. If the petitioner adopts any dilatorial tactics, it is open to the Trial Court to insist for his appearance and deal with the petitioner in accordance with the judgment of Supreme Court of India, in State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Shambunath Singh, reported in 2001 (4) SCC 667.

sd/- 13/08/2024 / TRUE COPY / /08/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I /II /III /IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

DAS 2/3

To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Pappanadu Police Station, Thanjavur District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.B.ANANDAN, Advocate ( SR-9904[I] dated 13/08/2024 )

ORDER

IN in CRL OP(MD) No.13276 of 2024 Date :13/08/2024 ED/ JGB /SAR- (27/08/2024) 3P / 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 3/3