Lingasekar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/01/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR Lingasekar ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs State rep.by its., The Inspector of Police, Manikandam Police Station, Manikandam, Trichy District.

Crime No.651/2020. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.N.Anandakumar, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.Sreenivasan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime no.651 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

2. The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b), 379, 506(i) IPC, in Crime No.651 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

3.The case of the prosecution is that based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant alleging that on 21.12.2020, at about 11.00 am, without the permission of the defacto complainant, the petitioner along with others trespassed into the lands of the defacto complainant and cut down the R.S.Pathy trees to the count of 2000 and caused a loss of Rs.3,00,000/- to the defacto complainant, a case in Crime No.651 of 2020 has been registered by the respondent police.

1/3

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he only cut down the top of the trees, which becomes a hindrance to the electricity supply to the petitioner's agricultural field, due to which, there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. 5.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) would submit that based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, a case has been registered against the petitioner and others in Crime No.651 of 2020, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 379 and 506(i) IPC.

6.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case,this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to draw a demand draft in favour of The Dean, Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court. The petitioner shall produce the proof of remittance /submission of Demand Draft to Dean while executing sureties.

[b] On acknowledgment of the same by the Dean, Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Trichy, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions 2/3

have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused / petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 07/01/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, TRICHY.

2.DO THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANIKANDAM POLICE STATION, MANIKANDAM, TRICHY DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

COPY TO: THE DEAN, GOVERNMENT RAJAJI HOSPITAL, MADURAI

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16118 of 2020 Date :07/01/2021 VRN PK/SMA/SAR-I/29.01.2021 : 3P/6C 3/3