← Library
Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/843/2014dismissed as infructuous

Coastal Energen Private Ltd v. Mother Infra,By Its Proprietor

2020-07-17Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.07.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM C.R.P. (PD) (MD)No.843 and 844 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).No.2 and 3 of 2014 ( in both C.R.Ps) Coastal Energen Private Limited, through its General Manager, P.Sundararajan, Coastal Energen Private Limited, Melamarudur Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District.

... Petitioner / Respondent/ Respondent in CRP No.843 of 2014 Coastal Energen Private Limited, through its Authorised Agent, P.Sundarrajan, Coastal Energen Private Limited, Melamarudur Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, Tuticorin District.

... Petitioner /Respondent / Respondent in C.R.P.No.844/2014 (cause title accepted vide order dated 09.04.2014 & made in M.P.(MD).Nos.1 & 1 /2014 in C.R.P.(MD).SR.Nos.17164 and 17168/2014) Vs.

Mother Infra By its Proprietor, Varadharaja Perumal No.2/505-A, Packialakshmi Nagar, Kathirvel Nagar Extension, Thoothukudi -08 And Now door No.5/218 G Dhavasiperumal Salai Kumarasamy Nagar, Muthayapuram Thoothukudi 05. ... Respondent/Petitioner/Petitioner in both C.R.Ps PRAYER in C.R.P. (MD)No.843 of 2014:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order dated 13.03.2014 made in I.A.No.61 of 2014 in A.R.O.P.No.91 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Court, Nagercoil.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ PRAYER in C.R.P. (MD)No.844 of 2014:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the petition and

order dated 13.03.2014 made in I.A.No.62 of 2014 in A.R.O.P.No.91 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Court, Nagercoil. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondent : Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan (in both C.R.Ps) COMMON ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the matter has become infructuous and hence, he requests to dismiss these civil revision petitions. He undertakes to send a memo to that effect.

2.Considering the said submission, these civil revision petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed. The petitioner is directed to send a memo to that effect through e-mail. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS II) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) vs Note:

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned. To The Principal District Judge, Nagercoil C.R.P. (PD) (MD)Nos.843 and 844 of 2014 17.07.2020 KK(27.07.2020) 2 P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/