Veermalai v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL OP(MD). No.12821 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17/09/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD). No.12821 of 2019 Veermalai ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The Inspector of Police, Kattuputhur Police Station, Trichy District.

(Crime No. 142 of 2019). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.V.Illanchezian, Advocate.

For Respondent : MR.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 142 of 2019 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

2. The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences under sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.142 of 2019, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

3. It is seen that the petitioner had attacked his father-inlaw with aruval causing him head injury. The petitioner had also caused cut injury on his mother-in-law. Both are still in hospital. I deny the relief of anticipatory not because the victims are in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.12821 of 2019 hospital. The allegations are such that the petitioner is not entitled to anticipatory bail. Hence, the criminal original petition stands dismissed.

sd/- 17/09/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KATTUPUTHUR POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.V.ILLANCHEZIAN Advocate SR.No.15667

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12821 of 2019 Date :17/09/2019 IAS PK/SK/SAR-1/24.09.2019 : 2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2