Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/965/2014dismissed as infructuous

Rajamanickam, v. Govindaswamy,

2020-11-19Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.965 of 2014 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.11.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.965 of 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 Rajamanickam ... Petitioner/Petitioner/5th Defendant Vs.

1.Govindasamy ... 1st Respondent/1st Respondent /Plaintiff 2.The Divisional Engineer, TNEB, Cauvery Nagar, Kulithalai.

3.The Superintendent Engineer, TNEB, Cauvery Nagar, Kulithalai.

4.The Executive Engineer, O & M, TNEB, Cauvery Nagar, Kulithalai.

5. The President, Chinthalavadi Panchayat, Krishnarayapuram Taluk.

... Respondents 2 to 5/Respondents 2 to 5/ Defendants 1 to 4 Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 19.12.2013 made in I.A.No.397 of 2013 in O.S.No.46 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kulithalai and allow the revision.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sridharan For R-1 : Mr.V.Karuna For R5 : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah For R2 to R4 : Mr.S.M.S.Johny Basha

O R D E R

The petitioner has filed this Civil Revision Petition against the fair and decreetal order dated 19.12.2013, made in I.A.No.397 of 2013 in O.S.No.46 of 2011, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kulithalai.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.R.P(NPD)(MD)No.965 of 2014

2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that subsequent to the filing of this Civil Revision Petition, the main original suit in O.S.No.46 of 2011, was dismissed for default on 25.10.2019.

3. In such view of the matter, nothing survives before this Court for adjudication. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (crl.side) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) pkn Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The District Munsif Court, Kulithalai.

2.The Record Keeper,(2copies) V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

C.R.P(MD)No.965 of 2014 (PD) 19.11.2020 SV(CO) KB(30.11.2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2