Bhuvaneshwari v. The Superintendent Of Police
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16434 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.10.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.16434 of 2021 Bhuvaneshwari ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur, Madurai District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Melur, Madurai District.
... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, directing the 1st respondent to withdraw the case in Crime No.466 of 2021 on the file of the 3rd respondent and transfer the same to any other competent investigating officer or agency based on the petitioner's representation dated 23.07.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Vadivelan For Respondents : Mr.RMS.Sethuraman Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This petition is filed seeking transfer of investigation from the file of the 3rd respondent to the file of some other Agency or Officer, on the basis of the representation dated 23.07.2021. 2.The case of the petitioner is that based upon the complaint given by her, a case in Crime No.466 of 2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b) and 506 (i) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act, 2003 has been registered. But, in spite of the aforesaid registration of the FIR, no progress has been made in the investigation. Hence, this petition.
3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents would submit that investigation has been completed, the closure report is also made ready and RCS notice has also been served upon the petitioner on 26.10.2021 and it was closed as mistake of fact.
4.However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that signature has been obtained by the respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16434 of 2021 police in a blank paper, without intimating the reason. 5.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents would submit that the photographs show that the petitioner has signed.
6.Whatever it may be, now the complaint has been closed and therefore, the petitioner has to workout her remedy before the appropriate Court through appropriate proceeding as no more consideration or direction is required in this matter. 7.By giving the aforesaid liberty, this petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (W) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) mm Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur, Madurai District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Melur, Madurai District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16434 of 2021 27.10.2021 RD/SKN (24.11.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2