The State Of Tamilnadu v. R.Selvaraj
Review Application (MD)No.98 of 2014 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.10.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Review Application (MD)No.98 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.2 of 2014 1.The State of Tamilnadu Rep by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Joint Director of School Education (Secondary), Chennai - 600 006.
3.The District Educational Officer, Lalgudi, Trichy District.
... Review Petitioners/ Appellants Vs.
1. R.Selvaraj 2.The Correspondent St. Johns Higher Secondary School, Irungalur, Mannachanallur Taluk, Trichy District.
... Respondents /Respondents PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order XLVII, Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 23.08.2013 made in W.A.(MD) No.905 of 2013. Prayer in WA(MD). 905/ 2013 :
To prefer this Memorandum of Grounds of Writ Appeal before this Honourable Court as against the order of Honourable court, dated 30.07.2010 passed in W.P.(MD)No.9454 of 2010 on the file of this Honoruable High Court.
Prayer in WP(MD). 9454/ 2010 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS or any other appropriate Writ or Order or Directions in the nature of writ, calling for the records, pertaining to the order passed in G.O.Ms.No.152, Education https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2
Review Application (MD)No.98 of 2014 Department, dated 5.8.2005 and that of the 2nd respondent in Mu.Mu.No.61241/D2/E1/09 dated 4.12.2009 and quash the same, in so far as the petitioner is concerned, and direct the respondents to continue the petitioner s scale of pay of Rs. 1400/- as per V th Pay Commission and further revised at Rs.5000/- as per VI th Pay Commission and confer all the consequential benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Sasikumar, Additional Government Pleader For Respondents : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam - for R1
ORDER
J. NISHA BANU, J.
AND N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
The Division Bench had allowed the writ appeal by following the earlier order passed by this Court. In any case, we do not find any error apparent on the face of the order, dated 23.08.2013 passed in W.A.(MD) No.905 of 2013. That apart, it is informed to us that the order has been complied with and the benefits have been given to the petitioner.
2. In view of the above, this review application stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (A.E) // True Copy // /11/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rm +1 CC to M/s.V.PANNEER SELVAM, Advocate ( SR-49655[F] dated 14/10/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-49649[F] dated 14/10/2022 ) Review Application (MD)No.98 of 2014 12.10.2022 AMS(03.11.2022) 2P 3C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2