K.Vinesh Kumar @ Vignesh v. The Inspector Of Police
Crl.M.P.(MD).No.10546 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fifth day of September Two Thousand and Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.M.P.(MD).No.10546 of 2022 in Crl.O.P(MD).No.SR30314 of 2022 K.VINESH KUMAR @ VIGNESH ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE FIR AS K.VIGNESHWARAN Vs 1 THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARTHIBANOOR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT (CRIME NO.62 OF 2022) 2 MARAGATHAVALLI ... RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to Dispense with the production of the certified copy of the FIR in Crime No.62 of 2022 on the file of the 1st Respondent Police. Prayer in Crl.O.P(MD).No.SR30314 of 2022:
To call for the records in Crime No.62 of 2022 on the file of the 1st respondent police.
Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.RANJIH KUMAR.P, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.R.MEENAKSHI SUNDARAM, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the 1st Respondent, the court made the following order:- This petition has been filed to dispense with the production of certified copy of the FIR in Crime No.62 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police.
2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner, as a accused, is entitled to get a certified copy. In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the certified copy need not be dispensed with. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2
Crl.M.P.(MD).No.10546 of 2022
3. The reason stated by the Petitioner seeking stay of the investigation cannot be accepted in the light of the offences alleged against the Petitioner by the second respondent. Already there is a civil dispute between the Petitioner and the neighbours, for which, the FIR was registered. Hence, the reasons cannot be accepted in the absence of the certified copies of the documents regarding the civil dispute. Therefore, this petition has no merits.
4. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed.
sd/- 05/09/2022 / TRUE COPY / /09/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARTHIBANOOR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN Crl.M.P.(MD).No.10546 of 2022 in Crl.O.P(MD).No.SR30314 of 2022 Date :05/09/2022 MK/SBN/SAR.IV/13.09.2022/2P/3C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2