Kalimuthu v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 25/06/2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Kalimuthu ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Inspector of Police, Thiruchuli Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

(Cr.No.121 of 2026). ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.121 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police For Petitioner : Vijayendiran V, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel For State of TN (Crl.Side) ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Section 25(1)(a) of Arms Act, in Crime No.121 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 15.03.2026, the petitioner and other accused posted the unlawful photos with using sword in their instagram ID 'Uyire'. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has no way connected in the above said incident. He would further submit that nobody sustained injury in the alleged occurrence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Counsel For State of TN (Crl.Side) would submit that the offence committed by the accused is grave in nature and the investigation is still pending and the petitioner has 1 previous case. Hence, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. He would 2/6

further submit that nobody sustained injury in the alleged occurrence.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioner, and nobody sustained injury in the alleged occurrence and though the prosecution stated that the petitioner has 1 previous case, in that case, he was released on bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchuli, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

3/6

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of 4 weeks, and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation.

[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can 4/6

be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

25.06.2026 dss To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchuli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruchuli Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P. DHANABAL,J dss

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12362 of 2026 Date : 25/06/2026 6/6