Subramaniam v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.01.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Subramaniam ... Petitioner /Vs./

1. The District Collector Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

2. The District Revenue Officer Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srirengam Revenue Division, Vannankovil, Tiruchirappalli District

4. The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Manapparai Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District

5. Thangaraj ... Respondents P RAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 3 and 4 to take appropriate action against the 5th respondent based on the petitioner's representation dated 11.07.2022 given to the respondents 1 to 3. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.T.M.Madasamy For Respondents : Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar Government Advocate for R1-4 : Mr.B.Prahalad Ravi for R5

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 would submit that the prayer sought for by the petitioner become infructuous.

2. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

21.01.2025 Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No LS 2/4

TO:-

1. The District Collector Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

2. The District Revenue Officer Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srirengam Revenue Division, Vannankovil, Tiruchirappalli District

4. The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Manapparai Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District.

3/4

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN , J.

LS Order made in Dated:

21.01.2025 4/4