Madras High CourtCMP(MD)/3725/2018dismissed for nonprosecution

Sudalaimani, v. Jegatheswaran,

2021-02-05Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

C.M.P(MD)No.3725 of 2018 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.02.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU C.M.P(MD)No.3725 of 2018 in C.R.P(MD) SR.No.39771 of 2017

1. Sudalaimani

2. Muthiah ... Petitioners/Petitioners Vs.

Jegatheswaran ....Respondent/Respondent Prayer in C.M.P(MD).No.3725 of 2018: This petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 81 days in filing the above Civil Revision Petition in filing the above Civil Revision Petition in C.R.P(MD) SR.No.39771 of 2017. Prayer in C.R.P(MD) SR.No.39771 of 2017: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, to call for the records and set aside the fair and decreetal order 21.04.2017 in I.A.No.75 of 2017 inO.S.No.187 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Srivaikundam and allow this Civil Revision with costs throughout.

For Petitioners : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.Mayilvahana Rajendran

ORDER

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 81 days in filing the Civil Revision Petition in C.R.P (MD) SR.No.39771 of 2017.

2. When the matter came up for hearing on 04.02.2021, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

C.M.P(MD)No.3725 of 2018 Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. In view of the order passed in CMP(MD)No.3725 of 2018, the connected C.R.P.(MD)SR.No.39771 of 2017 is rejected at the SR stage itself. No costs. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) pkn Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To The District Munsif, Srivaikundam.

C.M.P(MD)No.3725 of 2018 in C.R.P(MD) SR.No.39771 of 2017 05.02.2021 KM (15.02.2021) 2P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2