Balamurugan v. The Inspector Of Police
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13124 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.09.2019 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13124 of 2019 Balamurugan ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs.
1. State rep by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Vilathikulam, Tuticorin District, (Crime No.14 of 2016) ...1st Respondent/complainant 2.Malathi ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto complainant Prayer:
Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in connection with charge sheet in Special S.C.No.50 of 2018 on the file of the Mahila Sessions Judge, Tuticorin and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Jeyaramachandran For R1 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.C.Kathiravan
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the charge sheet in S.C.No.50 of 2018 on the file of the Mahila Sessions Judge, Tuticorin.
2. The case is still in the stage of proceedings. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves. 3.A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court which have been signed by the petitioner and the second respondent and also by their respective counsel. The petitioner and the second respondent were also present in person before this Court and they were identified by Mr.Subramani, SI of Police. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13124 of 2019 4.Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the proceedings pending before the the Mahila Sessions Judge, Tuticorin. Even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the proceedings in S.C.No.50 of 2018 on the file of the Mahila Sessions Judge, Tuticorin.
5.This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in S.C.No.50 of 2018 on the file of the Mahila Sessions Judge, Tuticorin, is quashed and the terms of joint compromise memo, which shall form part and parcel of this order. The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as costs, to the credit of the Chief Justice Relief Fund (payable in Accounts Section of the High Court Registry), within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar ENCL: Xerox Copy of the Compromise Memo To
1. The Sessions Judge, Mahalir Court, Tuticorin.
2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Vilathikulam, Tuticorin District,
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. COPY TO:
1. The Section Officer, Accounts Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
2. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.( 2 copies) +1 CC to M/s.A.JAYARAMACHANDRAN,Advocate SR-88511[F]dated 23/09/2019 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13124 of 2019 20/09/2019 1/2 dss MS/04.10.2019/2P.8C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2