M.Aravindan v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL OP(MD). No.16875 of 2021 and BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04/01/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI CRL OP(MD). No.16875 of 2021 and Crl.MP(MD) No.10114 of 2021 M.Aravindan, ... Petitioner/Accused No.8 Vs The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Radhapuram Police Station, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District (Crime No. 109 of 2021).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaisamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervenor : Mr.V.Rajiv Rufus,Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 109 of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A8, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police, for the alleged offences punishable under sections 465, 467, 468, 420 and 120B IPC in Crime No.109 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is a document writer. He along with other accused created a forged document and transferred the property of the defacto complainant in the name of other accused. Hence, the complaint. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.16875 of 2021 and 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this is the second petition filed by the petitioner for anticipatory bail. The earlier petition was dismissed on the ground that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is necessary in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is in no way connected with the case and he has no criminal intention except helping the defacto complainant to prepare the alleged draft sale deed. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that this is the second anticipatory bail petition. Earlier petition filed by the petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed and as on date, there is no change in circumstances.

5. Considering the fact that there is no change in circumstances, after the dismissal of earlier petition, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. sd/- 04/01/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

VRN Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RADHAPURAM POLICE STATION, RADHAPURAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16875 of 2021 Date :04/01/2022 PKP/VR/SAR-2/11.01.2022/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2