Madras High CourtWA(MD)/1395/2014dismissed for nonprosecution

B.Dinesh, v. K.Arumugam

2021-02-11Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana,Honourable Mrs Justice S.Kannammal2 pages

W.A(MD)NO.1395 OF 2014 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.02.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL W.A(MD)NO.1395 OF 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 B.Dinesh :Appellant/5th Respondent .vs.

1.K.Arumugam : Ist Respondent/Petitioner 2.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai North Division, Madurai.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Court, Madurai.

4.The Tahsildar, Madurai North Division, Madurai.

5.K.Chellam.

: Respondents 2 to 5/ Respondents 1 to 4 PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No888 of 2008, dated 06.08.2010.

Prayer in WP(MD). 888 of 2008 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in R.P.No.1/2003 dated 30/09/2007 on the file of the 1st respondent and Quash the same.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar 2 to 4 Special Govt.Pleader For Respondent-5 : Mr.T.K.Gopalan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.A(MD)NO.1395 OF 2014

JUDGMENT

************* [Judgment of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.] When the matter was taken up for hearing on 10.02.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and hence the matter is directed to be listed today under the caption ''for dismissal''.Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.

2.In view of the same, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) vsn Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned. To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai North Division, Madurai.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Court, Madurai.

3.The Tahsildar, Madurai North Division, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.PT.S.NARENDERAVASAN, Advocate ( SR-4695[F] dated 12/02/2021 ) JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)NO.1395 OF 2014 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 11.02.2021 KUN(CO) TR(01.03.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2