G.Aaro Selvam, v. The Commissioner,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.09.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2014 G.Aaro Selvam ... Appellant/Petitioner Vs.

The Commissioner, Bodinayakanoor Municipality, Theni District.

...Respondent /Respondent

PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.8734 of 2014, dated 13.06.2014.

For Appellant : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondent : Mr.M.Karuppasamy Pandian 1/4

JUDGMENT

J. NISHA BANU, J.

AND N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

The subject matter of challenge in the present writ appeal pertains to the order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the W.P(MD) No.8734 of 2014 by an order, dated 13.06.2014, refusing to interfere with the impugned notice issued by the respondent Municipality.

2.Heard Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr.M.Karuppasamy Pandian, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

3. We have carefully gone through the reasons assigned by the learned Single Judge at paragraph No.8 of the order and we do not find any ground to interfere with the same. That apart, a counteraffidavit has also been filed by the respondent and it is seen that the 2/4

respondent Municipality has already taken possession in the year 2014 itself and the lodge was demolished and new shops were constructed.

4. The learned Standing Counsel submitted that after the shops were constructed, it was also let out after calling for tender and this process has been completed twice till date.

5. In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in this Writ Appeal and accordingly, the same is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [J.N.B, J.] & [N.A.V., J.] 21.09.2022 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No rm 3/4

J. NISHA BANU, J.

AND N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

rm JUDGMENT MADE IN 21.09.2022 4/4