Ramadoss v. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.08.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.8318 and 8319 of 2024 Ramadoss ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar Rural, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar Rural Police Station, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.
(Crime No.231 of 2023) 3.Kannan ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 B.N.S.S., to call for the records of proceedings of Spl.S.C.No.34 of 2024 on the file of the Special Court for the Exclusive Trial of SC & ST Cases, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District and quash the same. 1/10
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 528 B.N.S.S., seeking orders to quash the charge sheet in Spl.S.C.No.34 of 2024 on the file of the Special Court for the Exclusive Trial of SC and ST Cases, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 18.12.2023 at about 07.00 p.m., the petitioner had assaulted the third respondent/defacto complainant and abused him in filthy language and also caused criminal intimidation.
3. It is seen from the records that on the basis of the complaint lodged by the third respondent, FIR came to be registered in Crime No. 231 of 2023 on 18.12.2023 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(1) IPC and Sections 3(l)(r) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) 2/10
Amendment Act, 2015 against the petitioner and after completing the investigation, the second respondent has filed the final report against the petitioner before the PCR Court, Srivilliputhur and the case was taken cognizance in Spl.S.C.No.34 of 2024 and is pending on the file of the Special Court for the Exclusive Trial of SC and ST Cases, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.
4. The main contention of the petitioner is that there are no averments either in the complaint or in the 161 statement to attract the provisions of SC/ST Act, that the allegation against the petitioner is taken as true, only IPC offences are made out and no SC/ST offence is made out and that due to political motive, the above case came to be filed.
5. As rightly contended by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), it is not necessary that the accused person has to abuse with filthy language referring the name of the caste of the defacto complainant and the occurrence alleged by the prosecution would attract the offences under Sections 3(l)(r) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (POA) Act. 3/10
Except the above, the petitioner has not canvassed any other reason or ground to impugn the charge sheet.
6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and others Vs. Bhajan Lal and others reported in 1992 SCC (Cri) 426 has enumerated 7 categories of cases, where the power can be exercised under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure and the same are extracted hereunder:- "102. In the backdrop of the interpretation of the various relevant provisions of the Code under Chapter XIV and of the principles of law enunciated by this Court in a series of decisions relating to the exercise of the extraordinary power under Article 226 or the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code which we have extracted and reproduced above, we give the following categories of cases by way of illustration wherein such power could be exercised either to prevent abuse of the process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice, though it may not be possible to lay down any precise, clearly defined and sufficiently channelised and inflexible guidelines or rigid formulae and to give an exhaustive list of myriad kinds of cases wherein such power should be exercised.
4/10
(1) where the allegations made in the First Information Report or the complaint, even if they are taken at their face value and accepted in their entirety do not prima facie constitute any offence or make out a case against the accused;
(2) where the allegations in the First Information Report and other materials, if any, accompanying the F.I.R. do not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an investigation by police officers under Section 156(1) of the Code except under an order of a Magistrate within the purview of Section 155(2) of the Code;
(3) where the uncontroverted allegations made in the FIR or 'complaint and the evidence collected in support of the same do not disclose the commission of any offence and make out a case against the accused;
(4) where the allegations in the FIR do not constitute a cognizable offence but constitute only a non-cognizable offence, no investigation is permitted by a police officer without an order of a Magistrate as contemplated under Section 155(2) of the Code;
(5) where the allegations made in the FIR or complaint are so absurd and inherently improbable 5/10
on the basis of which no prudent person can ever reach a just conclusion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused;
(6) where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the Code or the concerned Act (under which a criminal proceeding is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or where there is a specific provision in the Code or the concerned Act, providing efficacious redress for the grievance of the aggrieved party;
(7) where a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended with mala fide and/or where the proceeding is maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and with a view to spite him due to private and personal grudge."
7. In Dr.Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others reported in 2019 (18) SCC 191, the Hon'ble Apex Court has specifically held that exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings is an exception and not a rule. It is settled law that the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is 6/10
wide but at the same time, the same is to be exercised sparingly, carefully and with caution and only when such exercise is justified by the tests specifically laid down in the Section itself.
8. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kaptan Singh Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and others reported in 2021 (3) Crimes 247 has stated that, that Court in catena of decisions has observed that the High Court is not required to go into the merits of the allegations and/or enter into the merits of the case as if the High Court is exercising the appellate jurisdiction and/or conducting the trial and that question is required to be examined keeping in view, the contents of FIR and prima facie materials, if any, requiring no proof and at such stage, the High Court cannot appreciate evidence nor can it draw its own inferences from contents of FIR and materials relied on.
9. A cursory perusal of the final report and the statements filed along with the final report would make it clear that there existed a prima facie case to proceed against the petitioner. 7/10
10. Considering the above and also the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) and also taking note of the fact that this is not a fit case to quash the charge sheet against the petitioner, this Court concludes that the petition is devoid of merit and the same is liable to be dismissed.
11. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 16.08.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No csm To 1.The Special Court for the Exclusive Trial of SC & ST Cases, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar Rural, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar Rural Police Station, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
8/10
9/10
K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.
csm Order made in and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.8318 and 8319 of 2024 Dated: 16.08.2024 10/10