← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/21299/2024disposed of

A.John Britto v. The Commissioner

2024-09-10Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.09.2024

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR A.John Britto ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Commissioner Disciplinary Proceedings 5/1-B, Vinayaga Nagar Madurai - 20 2.The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption Alagar Kovil Road Tallakulam Post Madurai ....Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to produce the witnesses before the Tribunal for the Disciplinary proceedings for earlier disposal and ordered to complete the disciplinary proceedings within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.G.Mohan For Respondents : Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader

ORDER

The instant writ petition has been filed by an Inspector of Police seeking a mandamus directing the second respondent to produce witnesses before the Tribunal for disciplinary proceedings for expeditious disposal. 2.The petitioner was issued with a charge memo by the Tribunal on 16.12.2022.

3.According to the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, the second respondent is not producing their witnesses and they are not co-operating for expeditious disposal of the enquiry proceedings. Hence, the present writ petition.

4.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the second respondent, on instructions, submitted that due to heavy pendency before the Tribunal, the cases are adjourned every two months. Out of 44 witnesses, one of them has already been examined and for examining the other witnesses, they require six months time. The second respondent has filed a counter to that effect.

5.Paragraph Nos.7 and 8 of the counter is extracted as follows: "7. It is respectfully submitted that Commissioner, Tribunal proceedings, Madurai had further posted the enquiry on 29.10.2024. The 161 (3) Cr.P.C statements of some witnesses are lengthy and it requires more time to record their evidence during rial as both chief and cross examination are to be recorded. Under these circumstances, it is submitted that I will try my level best to produce at least a minimum of two witnesses in the forthcoming hearings and will support to dispose the case within a minimum span of time. 8.It is respectfully submitted, upon considering the above mentioned facts and circumstances, the Honourable High Court may be pleased to grant a period of 6 months time in WP(MD).No.21299 of 2024 to complete the Tribunal Enquiry and thus render justice."

6. In view of the above said facts, there shall be a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to complete the disciplinary proceedings on or before 30.04.2025.

7.With the above said directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 10.09.2024 Intex : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No msa

To 1.The Commissioner Disciplinary Proceedings 5/1-B, Vinayaga Nagar Madurai - 20 2.The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption Alagar Kovil Road Tallakulam Post Madurai

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

msa W.P.(MD)No.

21299 of 2024 10.09.2024