S.Sahanakavi v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.07.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Sahanakavi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul S.P. Office, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, AWPS Vadamadurai Station, Vadamadurai, Dindigul District.

3.T.Ajith ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.05.2025 and direct him to take action based on the petitioner complaint within the stipulated period as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunnithy For R1 & R2 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner has lodged a complaint as against her husband and in-laws and has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to take appropriate action on her complaint.

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the official respondents submits that since it is a matrimonial dispute, they have referred the complaint of the petitioner to the Social Welfare Officer.

3.Recording the above submission, this writ petition is closed with a direction to the respondent Police to ensure that the petitioner, the third respondent and in-laws of the petitioner are co-operating before the Social Welfare Officer. No costs. 21.07.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No gns 2/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul S.P. Office, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, AWPS Vadamadurai Station, Vadamadurai, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4.The Social Welfare Officer, District Social Welfare Office, Dindigul District.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

gns 21.07.2025 4/4