Muniyammal v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Muniyammal ... Petitioner versus

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2. The State, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Sempatty Police Station, Sempatty, Dindigul District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to take action on the petitioner's complaint dated 30.06.2025 within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : M/s.M.Benazir Begum For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner has lodged a complaint dated 30.06.2025 and has also filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to take action on her complaint dated 30.06.2025.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner's complaint was treated as petition enquiry in CSR No.398 of 2025 dated 01.07.2025 and the same was closed on 21.07.2025.

3. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this writ petition is closed with a direction to the respondent Police to furnish a copy of the closure report to the petitioner to workout her remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. 05.08.2025 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

2/4

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Sempatty Police Station, Sempatty, Dindigul District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 05.08.2025 4/4