Sureshkumar v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.07.2025 CORAM :

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Sureshkumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Statino, Dindigul District.

3. Perumal

4. Selvaraj

5. Sarangapani

6. Balaji ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 BNSS, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondent to give adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner based on the representation dated 10.07.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Ezhilarasu For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy, Government Advocate(crl.side) 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking Police Protection. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there was a property dispute between the petitioner and the private respondents herein. Due to which, the private respondents damaged the plantain trees of the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner has submitted a representation before the first respondent seeking Police protection. Since no action has been taken on his representation, the petitioner has preferred the present petition.

3.This Court is of the view that the petitioner has to workout his remedy only before the civil Court. Police has noting to do with the civil dispute. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is closed. 21.07.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes gns 2/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Statino, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI,J gns 21.07.2025 4/4