Syed Nazeep @ Syed Najeeb v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.09.2022

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP CRL.O.P(MD)No.16822 of 2022 1.Syed Nazeep 2.Mohamed Manzur @ Mohamed Mansoor 3.Jawahar Nisha 4.Nafila @ Nabila Banu 5.Rafic Raja @ Rafeek Raja 6.Rani @ Noorjahan

...Petitioners

-vs1.The State represented by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thallakulam, Madurai District.

(in Cr.No.35 of 2021) 2.Noozereth @ Noozereth Begam

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to call for the records pertaining to Cr.No.35 of 2021, dated 02.08.2021 on the file of the Inspector of Police, AWPS Thallakulam, Madurai City and to quash the same.

For Petitioner :Mr.S.Sathya Chidambaram For R1 :Mr.R.Sivakumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 :Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed **** 1/4

O R D E R

The learned Counsel for the Petitioners seeks to quash the FIR in Cr.No.35 of 2021 on the file of the first Respondent Police on the ground that after registration of the FIR, the Petitioners herein, who are arrayed as accused, and the De-facto Complainant had arrived at a compromise. A Joint Compromise Memo is also filed along with this Petition.

2.The learned Counsel for the Second Respondent/De-facto Complainant submitted that the De-facto Complainant has received a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- by way of demand drafts. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) has no objection to quash the First Information Report by recording compromise.

3.In the light of the Joint Compromise Memo, this Petition is allowed and the FIR in Cr.No.35 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent Police is quashed. The Joint Compromise Memo shall form part of this order.

Index:Yes/No 26.09.2022 cmr 2/4

To The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thallakulam, Madurai District.

3/4

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP , J.

cmr CRL.O.P(MD)No.16822 of 2022 26.09.2022 4/4