Mohamed Suhail v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. O.P(MD) No.13512 of 2024 1.Mohamed Suhail 2.Jabar @ Jaffer Ali ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

2. Prem Nazeer 3.Fawmitha Faisha ... Respondents (R3 is impleaded vide order dated 01.04.2025 in Crl.M.P.(MD) No.1752 of 2025) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 to call for the records and quash the charge sheet in FIR in Crime No.103 of 2022, on the file of the first respondent police.

For petitioners :Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For R1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Page No. 1 of 4

For R2 & R3 : Mr.R.Shenbaga Raj *****

O R D E R

This petition has been filed by the petitioners to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.103 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent police, for the offences under Sections 294(b), 384, 506(ii) IPC and 67 of Information Technology Act, 2000 and quash the same.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsels on both sides represented that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court.

3. The defacto-complainant and all the accused are present and this Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The victim/third respondent also filed affidavit. The defacto-complainant represented that as the third respondent married another man and is living peacefully and in order to end the dispute, they entered into a compromise and he has no objection to quash the FIR. A compromise memo, dated 12.08.2024 Page No. 2 of 4

signed by the parties and their respective counsel, is also filed before this Court.

4. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo.

5. Considering the nature of the offences and they have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition.

6. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and the First Information Report in Crime No. 103 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent police is quashed.

01.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No (2/2) Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To

1. The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No. 3 of 4

P.DHANABAL,J apd Crl.OP(MD) No.13512 of 2024 01.04.2025 (2/2) Page No. 4 of 4