Ravi v. The Secretary To Government

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.09.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.15396 to 15402, 15404 and 15405 of 2022 W.P.(MD)No.21203 of 2022 Ravi ... Petitioner versus St. George Fort, Chennai.

1/7

6. Lingesh ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 5th respondent in Na.Ka.No.271/2022/A2 dated 08.08.2022 as far as the Shop No.1 is concerned and quash the same and consequently, direct the 5th respondent to allocate the shop to the petitioner. W.P.(MD)No.21204 of 2022 Ibrahim ... Petitioner versus St. George Fort, Chennai.

2/7

6. Syed Ali ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 5th respondent in Na.Ka.No.271/2022/A2 dated 08.08.2022 as far as the Shop No.2 is concerned and quash the same and consequently, direct the 5th respondent to allocate the shop to the petitioner. W.P.(MD)No.21205 of 2022 Seethalakshmi ... Petitioner versus St. George Fort, Chennai.

3/7

6. Sahul Hameed ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 5th respondent in Na.Ka.No.271/2022/A2 dated 08.08.2022 as far as the Shop No.11 is concerned and quash the same and consequently, direct the 5th respondent to allocate the shop to the petitioner. For Petitioner in all W.Ps.

: Mr.S.Ramsundarvijayraj 4/7

For RR1, 2 and 4 : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, in all W.Ps.

Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, in all W.Ps.

Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R5 : Mr.P.Subbaraj, in all W.Ps.

Special Government Pleader For R6 in all W.Ps.

: No appearance COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

08.09.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

5/7

To St. George Fort, Chennai.

6/7

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 08.09.2023 7/7