Pavithran Alies Pavithiran v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 23/07/2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI 1.Pavithran @ Pavithiran 2.Pandieswaran @ Pandeeshwaran 3.Arun @ Arunpandiyan 4.Viji @ Vijay 5.Thanush @ Dhanush : Petitioners/A1 to A5 Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Tenkarai Police Station, Theni District.
(Crime No.338 of 2025) : Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.B.Arun, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.Prakash, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS. 1/5
PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.338 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351
(3) of BNS in Crime No.338 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant had borrowed a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- from the mother of the first accused, but has not yet repaid the amount. Upon questioning the first accused regarding the repayment, there arose dispute between them. Subsequently, the first accused, along with the other accused persons, abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and assaulted him and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocents and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide any 2/5
conditions that may be imposed by this Court. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent police submitted that the defacto complainant had borrowed a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- from the mother of the first accused, but has not yet repaid the amount. Due to which, there arose wordy quarrel between them and the petitioners abused the defacto complainant, attacked him and caused injuries. He further submitted that the injured was discharged from the hospital.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the facts that the injured was discharged from the hospital and most of the investigation might have been completed, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam, Theni District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam, Theni 3/5
District, and on further conditions that:
(a) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b) the petitioners shall furnish their residential address and mobile number to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam, Theni District. In the event of any change in their residential address, the petitioners shall report the same to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam, Theni District; (c) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;
(d) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(e) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; 4/5
(g) if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023.
sd/- 23/07/2025 / TRUE COPY / /2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
das TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam, Theni District.
2. Do Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Theni District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Tenkarai Police Station, Theni District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.B.ARUN, Advocate ( SR-8026[I] dated 25/07/2025 )
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.12216 of 2025 Date :23/07/2025 HPS/21.08.2025 5P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5