Raman v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Third day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.3225 of 2015 1 RAMAN 2 SURESH KUMAR 3 RAMAKRISHNAN 4 PERUMAL 5 ARUNKUMAR 6 MURUGESWARI 7 MAGESWARI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NILAKOTTAI POLICE STATION, NILAKOTTAI TALUK, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.62 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.VIVEKANANDAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 452, 294 (b), 323 and 307 IPC and Section 3(1) of PPDL Act, in Crime No.62 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioners have come forward with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 4.

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that there is a counter case in Crime No.63 of 2015 and there is no previous case against these petitioners.

5.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and that there is no previous case against these petitioners, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai on condition that the petitioners execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners shall stay at Vaiyampatti and report before Vaiyampatti Police Station, Madurai daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law, as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 23/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKKOTAI 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NILAKOTTAI POLICE STATION, NILAKOTTAI TALUK, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VAIYAMPATTI POLICE STATION VAIYAMPATTI 5 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.VIVEKANANDAN Advocate SR.No.8217

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.3225 of 2015 Date :23/02/2015 NA/24/02/2015/P2/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/