T.V.Shanmugasundaram v. Arcelor Mittal Dist.Soloutions

Crl OP(MD)No.3325 & 3326 of 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.09.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl OP(MD)Nos.3325 & 3326 of 2015 and MP(MD)Nos.1 & 1 of 2015 T.V.Shanmugasundaram Proprietor, M/s.Shriee Venkateswara Engineering Works, ... Petitioner / Accused in both cases Vs.

Arcelor Mittal Distribution Solutions India Private Limited, Delphi A-403 and B-402, Hiranandani Business Park, Powai, Mumbai 400 076 Also at Commercial Office, D-28, SIDCO Industrial Estate (D.P.Estate), Thuvakudi, Trichy 620 115, Rep.by K.S.Manoj ... Respondent / Complainant in both cases Common Prayer : Criminal Original Petitions are filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the S.T.C No.60 & 305 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruchirappalli and quash the same. In both cases :

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jameel Arasu For Respondent : Mr.B.Muruganandam COMMON ORDER These petitions have been filed to quash the impugned proceedings arising under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The primary ground urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the complaint has been filed by a person who is not authorised to do so. I am of the view that this is a pure question of fact and this has to be raised only before the regular trial and not before this Court. I find no merit in these criminal https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl OP(MD)No.3325 & 3326 of 2015 original petitions. They stand dismissed. Connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruchirappalli.

+2 CC to Mr.B.MURUGANANDAM, Advocate SR-89119,89120 Crl OP(MD)Nos.3325 & 3326 of 2015 24.09.2019 skm MK (09.10.2019) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2