Indirani v. The Insepctor Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Seventeenth day of March Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.4940 of 2015 INDIRANI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE NARIKUDI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DT.

CRIME NO. 30 OF 2015.

... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.R.ANBARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294[b] and 324 of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No.30 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The de facto complainant is the brother-in-law of the petitioner and it is alleged that there was a fight amongst the family members, in which the petitioner is said to have assaulted the de facto complainant. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that injured has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case as against this petitioner.

3. Considering the facts and the injured has already been discharged from hospital and that the petitioner has no previous antecedent, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10:30 in the morning for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ [b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor whether the petitioner is complying with the order or not. sd/- 17/03/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI.

2.DO THRO THE CHEIF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3.THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4.THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE NARIKUDI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.S.R.ANBARASU Advocate SR.No.12949

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4940 of 2015 Date :17/03/2015 RG.19.03.2015 2P.6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/