Sureshkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twentieth day of May Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice V.S.RAVI CRL OP(MD) No.9078 of 2015 SURESHKUMAR ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.5 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THUVAKUDI POLICE STATION, TRICHY.

(CR.NO.88/2015) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.D.RAMESHKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- This application has been filed by the petitioner/A5 to grant bail . The petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.04.2015 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 302, 506(ii) r.w 120-B IPC, in Crime No.88 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, the petitioner is seeking bail. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the State. 3.It is stated in the petition that the case has been registered against the petitioner for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 302, 506(ii) r.w 120-B IPC. It is also stated that the case has been filed on the basis of the complaint given by the de facto complainant one Umarani, who is the wife of the deceased Muneeswaran for the alleged occurrence said to have happened on 02.04.2015. Further, it is stated that the petitioner is the friend of A1 and on suspicion, he has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), on instructions from the respondent Police, has submitted that the petitioner is a blacksmith and manufacturing Arival and investigation is almost over and awaiting for chemical analysis report. He has further submitted that there is no bad antecedent or no previous case is pending against the petitioner. 5.On consideration of the above mentioned facts and circumstances and situation of the present case, it is found that the present case is a fit case for grant of bail with conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall execute separate personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand Only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy. (ii) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

(iii) The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, before the trial Court.

(iv)The petitioner shall not try to intimidate, threat, influence or allure the prosecution witnesses in any manner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

(v) In case of any breach or violation of any of the above said conditions, the State would be at liberty to move the Court for cancellation of bail granted to the petitioner. (vi) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police officer as and when required.

(vii)The petitioner should furnish his residential address to the investigation officer forthwith by producing the true copy of the ration card/Voter ID/Adhar Card.

sd/- 20/05/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, TRICHY.

2 -do-thro'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THUVAKUDI POLICE STATION, TRICHY. 5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY. +1. CC to M/S.D.RAMESHKUMAR Advocate SR.No.25931 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9078 of 2015 Date :20/05/2015 PBK/KBM 22/05/2015 ::2P-7C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/