← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/21385/2022closed

Chinnu Gounder v. The District Collector

2022-09-19Honourable Mr Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.09.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP W.P(MD)No.21385 of 2022 Chinnu Gounder ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Trichy District.

2.The Tahsildar, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Office of S.P., Trichy District.

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manaparai, Trichy District.

5.The Inspector of Police, Puthanatham Police Station, Trichy District.

6.Durairaj Gounder ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3 to 5 Respondents to adequate necessary police protection to conduct the festival at Police protection to conduct the festival at Pannangombu Bagavathi Amman Temple & Sri Mariyamman Temple, Manapparai Taluk, held on 10.09.2022, 11.09.2022 and 12.09.2022 in a peaceful manner and to direct the respondents to take appropriate action as against 6th respondent based in petitioner's representation, dated 18.08.2022.

1/4

For Petitioner :Mr.A.Thiyagarajan For R1 and R2 :Mrs.Christy Theboral Additional Government Pleader For R3 to R5 :Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor ***

ORDER

Heard Mr.A.Thiyagarajan, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mrs.Christy Theboral, learned Additional Government Pleader for Respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondents 3 to 5.

2.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for Respondents 1 and 2 submitted that the Peace Committee Meeting had not arrived at a compromise. When the rival parties had not arrived at an amicable settlement, it is difficult to proceed with the temple festival as it give rise to law and order issue. The report of the Tahsildar, Manapparai, is submitted by the learned Additional Government Pleader. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the date mentioned in the Writ Petition had already lapsed. Therefore, this Writ Petition itself had become infructuous.

2/4

4.If the Petitioner seeks direction, he has to come with a fresh Writ Petition. For the present, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. 19.09.2022 Index : Yes / No cmr To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Trichy District.

2.The Tahsildar, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Office of S.P., Trichy District.

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manaparai, Trichy District.

5.The Inspector of Police, Puthanatham Police Station, Trichy District.

3/4

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP cmr W.P(MD)No.21385 of 2022 19.09.2022 4/4