← Library
Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/1031/2024allowed

K.Velkani v. The Principal Secretary To Government,

2024-12-09Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan,Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.12.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA K.Velkani ... Petitioner / Mother of the Detenu Vs.

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.

... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records connected with the detention order passed in M.H.S.Confdl No.33/2024 dated 28.05.2024 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu or body of the detenu namely the petitioner's son ie., Prabinkumar @ Pravin, aged 1/4

about 23 years, S/o.Kannan, now detained at the Central Prison, Palayamkottai, before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Pragalathan For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthilkumar, Addl. Public Prosecutor.

O R D E R

(Order of the court was delivered by G.R.Swaminathan, J.) The petitioner's son was detained as "Goonda" vide order 28.05.2024 by the second respondent. It is seen that the accident register dated 30.04.2024 which is relied upon by the detaining authority has not been properly translated. Our attention is drawn to the order dated 24.07.2024 made in H.C.P.(MD)No.1633 of 2014 (Amutha Vs. State of Tamil Nadu). Paragraph No.4 of the said order reads as follows:- "4.On a perusal of the Booklet, it is seen that the Accident Registers have been improperly translated. This furnishing of improper translated copy of the vital document would deprive the detenu of making effective representation to the authorities against the order of detention."

The aforesaid decision squarely applies to the case on hand. 2/4

2.In this view of the matter, the impugned order is set aside. We hold that the detenu's detention is illegal. He shall be set at liberty forthwith unless his detention is otherwise warranted by law. 3.This habeas corpus petition is allowed accordingly. (G.R.S. J.,) & (R.P. J.,) 09.12.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias Issue order copy on 10.12.2024.

To:- 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

and R.POORNIMA, J.

ias 09.12.2024 4/4