← Library
Madras High CourtWP Crl.(MD)/725/2025dismissed

Esakkiammal v. The State Represented By Its,

2025-07-29Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira,Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.07.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA W.P.Crl.(MD)No.725 of 2025 and W.M.P.Crl.(MD)No.206 of 2025 Esakkiammal ... Petitioner/ Wife of the Detenue -Vs1. The State Represented by, The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home (Prison - IV) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Madurai Range, Central Prison, Madurai 625 001

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Madurai 625016

4. The Superintendent of Police Office of Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli-627 002.

.. Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the order bearing No.384/VuTha.2/2025, dated 10.06.2025 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and consecutively direct the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 21 days without escort to the detenue Marimuthu, son of Pandi, aged about 37 years, Convict No.6047, detained at Central Prison, Madurai. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J.) When the matter is taken up for hearing today, on instructions, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the convict prisoner is going on leave for the first time with escort. He would further submit that the victim in this case is none other than the own daughter of the petitioner and that is the reason why he has been permitted to go along with an escort. However, he would submit that the petitioner's wife is visiting him. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, we do not find anything wrong in sending the petitioner along with

escort since it is for the first time and the order needs no interference. Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[A.D.J.C., J.] & [R.P., J.] 29.07.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No PJL To

1. The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home (Prison - IV) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Madurai Range, Central Prison, Madurai- 625 001

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Madurai- 625 016.

4. The Superintendent of Police Office of Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli-627 002.

5. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

AND R.POORNIMA , J.

PJL WP Crl.(MD)No.725 of 2025 29.07.2025