Chella Moopar v. The District Collector,.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2014 Chella Moopar ... Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Tahsildar, Kariyapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

4.Marichamy ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of 1/4

the second respondent in his proceedings in Pa.VA.A2/40/2013 dated 24.09.2013 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of law and for other consequential orders. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Marimuthu For R1 to R3 : Mr.S.Saji Bino Special Government Pleader

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infrucutous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

06.03.2023 tta NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

2/4

To 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Tahsildar, Kariyapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

tta 06.03.2023 4/4