Madras High CourtWP(MD)/17532/2014dismissed for nonprosecution

B.Varghese v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2022-02-21Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.02.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and M.P.[MD]Nos.3 of 2014 & 1 of 2015 1.B.Varghese 2.G.Stephen 3.R.Suyambulingam 4.M.Ramsamy 5.G.Abraham 6.K.Sugarto Abdul Khader 7.M.Ayyappan 8.P.Chandran 9.S.Kumaresan 10.A.Arul Sekar 11.Y.David 12.G.Dhaveed 13.D.Babu 14.S.Perumal 15.P.Ramesh 16.K.Paramaraja 17.S.Raman 18.G.Balakrishnan 19.S.Andre Sajjen 20.K.Gopu 21.R.Vasanth 22.Rajaram 23.T.Narayana Perumal 24.J.Jayan 25.Nadaraj ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to the Department of Local Administration, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Director of Panchayats, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari.

1/3

4.The Chairman, Kanyakumari Special Grade Town Panchayat, Kanyakumari - 629 702.

5.The Executive Officer, Kanyakumari Special Grade Town Panchayat, Kanyakumari - 629 702.

... Respondents P RAYER:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings in Letter Memo in Rc.No.168/2013/A1 dated 10.09.2013, on the file of the fifth respondent herein, and to quash the same and direct the fifth respondent to implement the resolution dated 02.05.2013 passed by the fourth respondent Panchayat Council for the construction of permanent shops to carry on the businesses of the petitioners in Conch and Shell by forwarding the same along with all the required estimate, plans and reports to the respondents 1 to 3, for their consideration and approval, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : No representation For Respondents : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

Today the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. There is no representation for the petitioner. There was no representation on the side of the petitioner, even on the last hearing date i.e., on 10.02.2022. It can be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 2.Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) MR 2/3

NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Secretary to the Department of Local Administration, State of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Director of Panchayats, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari.

4.The Chairman, Kanyakumari Special Grade Town Panchayat, Kanyakumari - 629 702.

5.The Executive Officer, Kanyakumari Special Grade Town Panchayat, Kanyakumari - 629 702.

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-8075[F] dated 23/02/2022 ) 21.02.2022 SK(CO) KB(03.03.2022) 3P 7C 3/3