← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/17611/2014dismissed as infructuous

Muthukrishnan v. The Commissioner,

2022-02-10Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose2 pages

W.P(MD).No.17611 of 2014 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.02.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P(MD).No.17611 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 Muthukrishnan .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai - 34.

2.The Executive Officer cum Joint Commissioner, Arulmigu Dhandayuthapani Swamy Thirukovil, Palani, Dindigul District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of rejection dated 09.10.2014 issued by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.168/2011/C3 and consequential tender cum auction notification dated 16.10.2014, issued by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka. No. 2544/14/C3 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents 1 & 2 to extend the lease already granted in favour of the petitioner to run a hotel situated at Dhandapani Nilaya Valagam, Vadakku giri Veethi in Palani in the light of the order dated 25.09.2014 made in W.P.No.16286 of 2014 on the file of this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gandhi For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj for R1 Special Government Pleader

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. The said statement is recorded.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P(MD).No.17611 of 2014 2.Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) /TRUE COPY/ / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai - 34.

2.The Executive Officer cum Joint Commissioner, Arulmigu Dhandayuthapani Swamy Thirukovil, Palani, Dindigul District.

+1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-5666[F] dated 11/02/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-5684[F] dated 11/02/2022 ) W.P(MD).No.17611 of 2014 10.02.2022 MK/18.03.2022/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2