Selvi. S v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.12.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN S.Selvi ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai Revenue Division, Sivagangai District.

2.The Tahsildar, Kalaiyarkovil Taluk, Kalaiyarkovil, Sivagangai District.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Athapadaki Revenue Group, Athapadaki Post, Kalaiyarkovil Taluk, Sivagangai District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to make necessary in the Taluk as well as the Village Revenue Records in S.Nos.221/1 and 221/2 for the measurement of 0.19.0 and 0.20.0 Ares of Punja land respectively in Mallal Revenue Firka of Athapadaki Revenue Group in Karumanthakudi Village of Sivagangai District within the time limit as prescribed by this Court as per the representations made by the petitioner, dated 21.12.2018, 10.06.2019, 18.06.2019 and 06.09.2019 as well as the proceedings of the first and second respondents, dated 07.08.2019, 23.09.2019 and 24.01.2020.

For Petitioner :Mr.K.C.Ramalingam For Respondents :Mr.S.Kameshwaran Government Advocate

O R D E R

The Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of Mandamus with respect to the representations given by the petitioner on 1/3

21.12.2018, 10.06.2019, 18.06.2019 and 06.09.2019. 2.Heard Mr.K.C.Ramalingam, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kameshwaran, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

3.When the matter came up for hearing, Mr.S.Kameshwaran, learned Government Advocate pointed out that an order has been passed by the first respondent on 04.02.2020 in Na.Ka.No.A3/5505/2019.

4.A copy of the order has now been given to the learned Counsel for the petitioner in open Court. Service of the learned Counsel is deemed to service on the petitioner. The petitioner may move forward in manner known to law questioning the said order.

5.It is complained by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that opportunity had not been granted to the petitioner while passing the said order. The petitioner is at liberty to take up that particular ground also while questioning the said order. 6.In view of the said development, nothing survives for further adjudication. Hence, this Writ Petition, which is in the nature of Mandamus, is dismissed giving liberty as above. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS III) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cmr To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai Revenue Division, Sivagangai District.

2.The Tahsildar, Kalaiyarkovil Taluk, Kalaiyarkovil, Sivagangai District.

2/3

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Athapadaki Revenue Group, Athapadaki Post, Kalaiyarkovil Taluk, Sivagangai District.

+1 CC to M/s.K.C.RAMALINGAM, Advocate (SR-37671[F] dated 07/12/2021) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-37583[F] dated 07/12/2021 ) 06.12.2021 MMS(CO) SB(13.12.2021) 3P 6C 3/3