Madras High CourtSA(MD)/512/2015dismissed for default

V.Parasuraman v. A.Balachandran

2022-03-09Honourable Mrs Justice R. Tharani2 pages

S.A(MD)No.512 of 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 09.03.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI S.A(MD)No.512 of 2015 V.Parasuraman ... Appellant/2nd Respondent/ 2nd Defendant Vs 1.A.Balachandran ...1st Respondent/Appellant/ Plaintiff 2.Hu Ching Cheung 3.G.Veerachamy Naidu ...2nd & 3rd Respondents/ 1st & 3rd Respondents/ 1st &3rd Defendants PRAYER :- This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgement and decree dated 22.01.2010 in A.S.No.586 of 2004 on the Additional Subordinate Judge, Dindigul, reversing the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2003 in O.S.No.216 of 2002 on the file of the IInd Additional District Munsif Court, Dindigul.

For Appellants : Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar For R1 and R3 : Mr.R.Chandrasekar for M/s. Sarvabhauman Associates For R2 : No appearance

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel on either side present. The matter was listed before this Court on 07.02.2022 and 14.02.2022 and on both the dates, the learned counsel for the appellant was not ready for arguments. Again the matter was adjourned to 24.02.2022. On that date also, the learned counsel for the appellant was not ready for arguments and the case was adjourned to 09.03.2022, under the caption 'for orders'.

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing today(09.03.2022), the learned counsel for the appellant is not ready for arguments. The learned counsel for the respondent is ready. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

S.A(MD)No.512 of 2015 3.This Second Appeal is pending from the year 2015 and the original suit is of the year 2002. There is no use in keeping the appeal pending any further. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) pnn Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Additional Subordinate Judge, Dindigul. 2.The IInd Additional District Munsif, Dindigul. Copy to The Record Clerk, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. (2 copies) +1 CC to M/s.H.LAKSHMI SHANKAR, Advocate ( SR-11044[F] dated 10/03/2022 ) S.A(MD)No.512 of 2015 09.03.2022 RK(22/03/2022) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2