Madras High CourtCRL A(MD)/444/2016dismissed as infructuous

Balakrishnan v. The Inspector Of Police,

2021-04-22Honourable Mr Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup2 pages

CRL.A.(MD)Nos.444 to 447 of 2016 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.04.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP CRL.A.(MD)Nos.444 to 447 of 2016 Balakrishnan : Appellant in all cases Vs.

State through the Inspector of Police, Pappakudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

: Respondent in all cases PRAYER in Crl.A.(MD)No.444 of 2016: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code r/w Section 14A(2) SC/ST(POA) Act, to call for the records and set aside the bail dismissal order of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in Cr.M.P.No.2577 of 2016 in S.C.No.82 of 2016, dated 19.10.2016.

PRAYER in Crl.A.(MD)No.445 of 2016: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code 14A(2) SC/ST(POA) Act, to call fro the records and set aside the bail dismissal order of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in Cr.M.P.No.2574 of 2016 in S.C.No.85 of 2016, dated 19.10.2016. PRAYER in Crl.A.(MD)No.446 of 2016: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code 14A(2) SC/ST(POA) Act, to call fro the records and set aside the bail dismissal order of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in Cr.M.P.No.2575 of 2016 in S.C.No.84 of 2016, dated 19.10.2016. PRAYER in Crl.A.(MD)No.

447 of 2016: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code 14A(2) SC/ST(POA) Act, to call fro the records and set aside the bail dismissal order of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in Cr.M.P.No.2576 of 2016 in S.C.No.83 of 2016, dated 19.10.2016. For Appellant : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma Prabhu Government Advocate (Crl.side) (in all cases) *** https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.

CRL.A.(MD)Nos.444 to 447 of 2016 COMMON JUDGMENT When the matter came up for hearing on the previous occasion, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted a copy of the order of this Court passed by His Lordship Mr.Justice.K.Kalyanasundaram, in Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.20451 to 20454 of 2016, dated 25.10.2016, wherein, the cases in S.C.Nos.82 to 85 of 2016, which are the subject matter of these appeals, were quashed in respect of the petitioners therein are concerned. In that case, the appellant's name was not found. Therefore, to clarify the status of the present appellant, the case was posted "for clarification" today.

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) furnished the copies of the orders of this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.7580, 7581, 7584 and 7608 of 2017, passed by His Lordship Mr.Justice S.S.Sundar, whereby, the pending cases in S.C.Nos.82 to 85 of 2016, were quashed in respect of the appellant herein also.

3.These appeals have been filed challenging the order passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, cancelling the bail petitions filed by the appellant herein. Since, the original cases have already been quashed by this Court, nothing survives for further adjudication. Hence, these appeals are dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cmr To 1.The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. 2.The Inspector of Police, Pappakudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Government Advocate (Crl.side) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.

4.The Record Keeper,Criminal Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.(2 copies) CRL.A.(MD)Nos.444 to 447 of 2016 22.04.2021 ES(CO) TR(08.06.2021) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2