← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18971/2014closed

S.M.Anantha Murugan, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2023-03-08Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and MP(MD)No.2 of 2014 S.M.Anantha Murugan ... Petitioner v.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of State Highways, St.George Fort, Chennai.

2.The Chief Engineer (General), Tamil Nadu State Highways Authority, Department of State Highways, Chennai.

3.The Divisional Engineer (C & M), Divisional State Highways Authority, Virudhunagar Division, Virudhunagar.

4.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

1/5

5.The Sub Collector, Sub Collectorate Office, Srivilliputhur Road, Sivakasi.

6.The Tahsildar, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.

7.V.Murugan ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the third respondent's proceedings in T.R.B.No.26/2014-15/V1, dated 30.10.2014 and quash the same and further directing the respondents 1 to 3 to follow the order of the Apex Court's decision reported in TN Godavarman v. Union of India reported in 1996 9 SCR 982 and this Court's order in WP.No. 13766 dated 06.06.2014 to construct the roads without cutting the trees standing far away from the road.

For Petitioner / Party in person : Mr.S.M.Anantha Murugan For Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan, Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.6 No appearance for R.7 ***** 2/5

ORDER

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner as against the orders of the third respondent to cut down the trees for the purpose of widening of roads. 2.When the matter came up for hearing today, the petitioner / party-inperson submitted that the respondents have laid the road without cutting much trees and that a banyan tree, aged about 350 years, is still standing. Therefore, he is not pressing this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

3.Recording the aforesaid submission and the endorsement so made by the petitioner, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Index : Yes / No 08.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No gk 3/5

To 1.The Principal Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of State Highways, St.George Fort, Chennai.

2.The Chief Engineer (General), Tamil Nadu State Highways Authority, Department of State Highways, Chennai.

3.The Divisional Engineer (C & M), Divisional State Highways Authority, Virudhunagar Division, Virudhunagar.

4.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

5.The Sub Collector, Sub Collectorate Office, Srivilliputhur Road, Sivakasi.

6.The Tahsildar, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District.

4/5

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

gk 08.03.2023 5/5