Vairamuthu v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.11.2022 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP 1.Vairamuthu 2.Muthupandi 3.Shanmugaraja 4.Sakthivel ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Madurai District.

3.Vanadevi 4.Mayakrishanan ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second Respondent not to harass the Petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Prabhu For R1 - R2 : Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate (Crl.side) 1/4

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition had been filed to direct the second Respondent not to harass the Petitioner under the guise of enquiry. 2.When the case came up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the first and second Respondents submitted that based on the complaint given by the De-Facto Complainant, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed.

3. It is made clear, now that the complaint has been closed, the first and second Respondents shall not call the petitioners in the guise of enquiry and harass them.

4.With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

14.11.2022 Index : Yes/No vsd 2/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Anti Land Grabbing Cell, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J., vsd 14.11.2022 4/4