← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/24508/2018disposed of

S.Santhanakannan, v. The Distirict Collector

2024-02-29Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date : 29/02/2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL WP(MD) No.24508 of 2018 and WMP(MD) No.22217 of 2018 S.Santhanakannan ... Petitioner v.

1. The Distirict Collector, Dindigul District,Dindigul.

2. The Tahsildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.

3. The Commissioner of Panchayat Union, Dindigul Union @ Dindigul..

4. Sahul Hameed ... Respondents PRAYER :-Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action to make sure that the connection road starting from Dindigul to Batalagundu Main Road reaching to Adi Dravidar Colony, Chinnapallappatti, Begambur Post, Dindigul District is free from any hindrance by considering their representation dated 03.12.2018. 1/5

For Petitioner : M/s.N.Sathish Babu For Respondent : Mr.N.Satheeshkumar for R1 & R2 Additional Government Pleader Mr.S.Natarajan Senior Counsel for Mrs.Vijayakumari Natarajan for R4

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble The CHIEF JUSTICE] Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Senior Counsel for the respondent No.4.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.4 is not allowing the petitioner and the other persons to use the connection road starting from Dindigul to Batlagundu Main Road reaching to Adi Dravidar Colony, Chinnapallappatti. Hindrance is caused by the respondent No.4.

3. According to the learned Senior Advocate for the respondent No.4, lay-out is sanctioned. In the lay-out, existence of a road is already shown. The petitioner and other persons do not want to use the said road 2/5

and are trying to create the road from the land of the respondent No.4.

4. It would be a disputed question as to the exact location of the road. The concerned Panchayat Union may consider the grievance that may be putforth by the petitioner. The petitioner may give representation to the concerned Panchayat Union. The concerned Panchayat Union, after considering the stand putforth by the respondent No.4, shall decide the said representation of the petitioner, preferably, within six months from the date of the representation made.

5. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

[S.V.G., CJ.] [P.D.B., J.] 29.02.2024 NCC :

Yes/No Index :

Yes/No RR 3/5

TO

1. The Distirict Collector, Dindigul District , @ Dindigul.

2. The Tahsildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.

3. The Commissioner of Panchayat, Union, Dindigul Union @ Dindigul..

4/5

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.DHANABAL, J.

RR W.P.(MD)No.24508 of 2018 29.02.2024 5/5