Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/1686/2021dismissed

Uma Sarika v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-12-29Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan,Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy2 pages

H.C.P(MD)No.1686 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.12.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY H.C.P.(MD) No.1686 of 2021 Uma Sarika ... Petitioner / Wife of the detenu Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District.

3.Vijay 4.Banumathi 5.Pandian ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to secure the detenu and produce the person or body of the detenu namely, Pandian S/o.Vijay, aged about 25 years from the illegal custody of the third respondent before this Court and set him at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabhakar Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.) The detenu Pandiyan, had been secured and produced before this court by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District/ second respondent herein. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

H.C.P(MD)No.1686 of 2021 2.We had a discussion with the fifth respondent / Pandiyan. It appears that he had taken an independent decision to move out of the companionship of the petitioner herein. It is for both the petitioner and the fifth respondent to resolve their dispute in manner known to law. Since the detenu had been produced, and has been advised that it only be his advantage to settle the issues at the earliest, the Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rm/nsr Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate / litigant concerned.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

H.C.P.(MD) No.1686 of 2021 29.12.2021 RD(5.01.2022) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2