Senthil. N v. The Tahsildar

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.09.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.P(MD).No.21615 of 2022 N.Senthil : Petitioner Vs

1. The Tahsildar, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai District

2. Gnanamani,

3. Kamatchi,

4. Eashwari,

5. Lakshmi,

6. Perumal,

7. Raja,

8. Chandrasekar, : Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, by calling for the entire records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the first respondent vide his proceedings in NA.KA.No.m4/2397/2022 dated 1/4

18.08.2022 in respect of the property in S.No.111/2D measuring to the extent of 0.01.50 Ares i.e., 3.70 Cents bearing Patta No.14 at Panaiyur Village, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai District within a time stipulation as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji For R1 : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate

ORDER

The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the first respondent herein, under which, the request for grant of separate patta in favour of the petitioner, has been rejected. 2.The authority has found that the disputed property originally belongs to one Amma Pillai and thereafter, it has devolved upon so many legal heirs. Hence, the request for issuance of separate patta in favour of the petitioner is not legally sustainable. As against the order passed by the first respondent, the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy of statutory appeal before the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer.

2/4

3.Hence without expressing any opinion on the merits, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. The petitioner is at liberty to file an appeal before the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer.

12.09.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No lr To The Tahsildar, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai District 3/4

R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J.

lr W.P(MD).No.21615 of 2022 12.09.2022 4/4