← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16391/2022dismissed

Palraj v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-09-14Honourable Mrs Justice R. Tharani2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.16391 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Reserved on : 12.09.2022 Pronounced on : 14.09.2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CRL OP(MD). No.16391 of 2022 Palraj ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Andipatti Police Station, Theni District.

(Crime No.280/2022).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s. Senguttuarasan.P, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.280/2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.08.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b),324, 307, 448, 452, 506(ii), 109 of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.280 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to land dispute on 21.08.2022 on the instigation of the second accused the petitioner herein abused the defacto complainant and his family members, assaulted them with sickle and caused injuries, hence the case came to be registered.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that that due to previous enmity a false case has been foisted against https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.16391 of 2022 the petitioner. He would further submit that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 22.08.2022,hence he seeks bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner herein abused the defacto complainant and his family members, assaulted them with sickle and caused injuries. He would further submit that in the said occurrence four persons sustained injuries. He would also submit that all the injured were discharged from the hospital, hence opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the role played by the petitioner and also taking note of the injuries sustained, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. In the result, the petition stands dismissed. sd/- 14/09/2022 / TRUE COPY / /09/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

aav TO 1.THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT PRISON, THENI.

2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANDIPATTI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16391 of 2022 Date :14/09/2022 RK/SBN/SAR-1(16/09/2022) 2P/4C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2