Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8563/2018disposed of

N.Thangavel v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-05-30Honourable Mrs Justice T. Krishnavalli (Retd.)2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD) No.8563 of 2018 1 N.THANGAVEL 2 N.KUPPUSAMY ... PETITIONERS/A1 & A2 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BATLAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CR NO. 212/2018 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.N.THAMIMUL ANSARI, Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed A1 & A2 apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 294(b), 324, (*) 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No. 212 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant and his father visited their joint family property along with the petitioners and that the petitioners packed the coconuts from the garden and the same was questioned by the defacto complainant and his father, the petitioners attacked them and scolded in filthy language and gave life threat to them.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and that they have not committed any such offences as alleged by the defacto complainant.

4. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the nature of the allegation made against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/05/2018 (*)Amended as per order of this Hon'ble Court made in Crl.MP(MD)No.3849/2018 in Crl.OP(MD)No.8563/2018 dated 30.05.2018.

/ TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BATLAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.N.THAMIMUL ANSARI, Advocate SR.No.66249

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8563 of 2018 Date :30/05/2018 PK/CSL/VK/05.06.2018 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/