← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/20238/2024allowed

Sathurangapani v. The Inspector General Of Registration

2025-06-19Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Sathurangapani ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Inspector General of Registration, O/o.Of the Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai.

2. The District Registrar (Administration), Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

3. The Sub-Registrar, Trichuli Sub-Registrar Officer, Trichuli, Virudhunagar District.

4. Ellaiammal @ Ellammal,

5. Veerammal ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in pertaining to the impugned refused check slip No. 49/2024 dated 30.07.2024 of the third respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the third respondent to register the document presented by the petitioner in respect of 1/4

survey number 48/3A in an extent of 0.09.70 hectors situated at Gurunaikulam revenue Village, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District, For Petitioner : Mr.T.Vadivelan For R-1 to 3 : Mr.G.Suriya Ananth Additional Government Pleader For R-4 : Unclaimed For R-5 : Died

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the refusal check slip dated 30.07.2024 and consequently to direct the third respondent to register the document presented by the petitioner.

2. The third respondent refused to register the document on the ground that already there is a document registered in Document No.10099 of 1997. Therefore, the petitioner does not have any right to sell the property, as the property belongs to a third party through the said document. Further it was stated that if the petitioner's document is registered then it would amount to a double entry.

2/4

3. The issue of double entry has already been considered by this Court in the case of T.Senthilvel Vs. The District Registrar and others in W.P.(MD)No. 22114 of 2024 dated 17.10.2024, wherein, the Hon'ble Single Judge held that based on double entry the respondent cannot refuse registration.

4. Therefore, following the said judgment, the impugned refusal check slip is hereby quashed. The third respondent is directed to register the document, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above said direction, this Writ Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.

19.06.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes jbr 3/4

S.SRIMATHY , J.

jbr To:

1. The Inspector General of Registration, O/o.Of the Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai.

2. The District Registrar (Administration), Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

3. The Sub-Registrar, Trichuli Sub-Registrar Officer, Trichuli, Virudhunagar District.

ORDER MADE IN DATED : 19.06.2025 4/4