← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16439/2022allowed

Gobi @ Gopinath v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-09-28Honourable Mr Justice A.A.Nakkiran3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28/09/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN CRL OP(MD). No.16439 of 2022 Gobi @ Gopinath ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Thiruvidaimaruthur Police Station, Thanjavur District.

(Crime No.680 of 2022). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Karunakaran K.M., Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Veeranthiran, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.680 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there is a temple dispute is pending between the defacto complainant and the petitioner, due to which, on 31.07.2022, the petitioner and other accused abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, attacked him and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to previous enmity, a false case has been foisted against the petitioner and he is an innocent person and he did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, he would further submit that the petitioner shall abide any condition imposed by this Court and he may be granted anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He would further submit that the petitioner is having five previous case and the investigation is not yet completed. Hence, he strongly opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioner shall report before respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

Sd/- 28/09/2022 / TRUE COPY / /10/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

CP Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVIDAIMARUTHUR.

2. -DO- THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVIDAIMARUTHUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.KARUNAKARAN K.M. Advocate SR.No.10682

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16439 of 2022 Date :28/09/2022 SP/GB/SAR /10/10/2022/3P/6C